Category: Motorcycle News

Having driven both the extremely well-rounded Maverick Hybrid, now finally available with all-wheel drive, and the peppy little Maverick Lobo sport truck, and frankly falling head over heels for both, it was time to get my boots a bit dirtier with the adventure-ready, mud-seeking Ford Maverick Tremor. Somewhat akin to Subaru’s “Wilderness” branding in spirit, the Tremor package adds all-terrain tires, extra ground clearance, and a twin-clutch rear drive unit, giving the Maverick more to work with on rough roads and trails, as well as a graphics package that adds a bit more spark to the truck’s otherwise quite sensible looks. I spent a week driving Ford’s latest little off-roader around British Columbia’s Pacific coast to see whether the Tremor’s additions make or break the compact ute, and whether its relatively hefty price tag could be better spent elsewhere.

Choosing the Tremor means choosing the turbocharged 2.0-liter engine, since Ford doesn’t offer a hybrid version here. In return, you get specialized suspension and traction hardware for rougher terrain, but you also trade off towing capability, road noise, handling, and fuel economy. I wanted to see whether those additions are worth it compared with a less expensive, more economical Maverick, and whether the Tremor’s steep price tag justifies itself over a larger, more capable Ranger. Ultimately, by the end of my week with this rugged little truck, my overall opinion of the Maverick remained favorable, but I’m not totally convinced the Tremor is the best way to have one.

2026 Ford Maverick Tremor Specifications

U.S. specifications. Power and torque are rated on premium fuel. Payload varies with configuration.

Thinking about selling your car? Get an instant cash offer online now. Click here to get started.

Powertrain & Driving Dynamics: 7.5/10 — How Much Truck Do You Really Need?

Like the adrenaline-injected Maverick Lobo, the Tremor’s standard 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder delivers plenty of exciting turbocharged whooshes and responsive low-end torque; both variants also share that trick twin-clutch rear-drive unit and torque-vectoring capabilities. Whereas the Lobo gets a quick-shifting seven-speed gearbox, the Tremor keeps the eight-speed automatic transmission found throughout the rest of the non-electrified Maverick lineup, offering smoother, more robust shifts. In the higher end of the rev range, that little four-cylinder can produce a coarser note, but since it favors low-end power delivery and heavy boost, you’ll rarely find yourself using the latter half of the available RPMs anyway.

Unlike the Lobo, which handles surprisingly well for something with a pickup bed, the Tremor sacrifices much of its lateral control for greater off-road capability, thanks to its chunky Goodyear all-terrain rubber, raised ride height, and uniquely calibrated suspension. Handling on curvy roads and highways is noticeably worse than on other Maverick trims, and those hefty tires also produce much more road noise. These trade-offs are to be expected in a vehicle that prioritizes off-road use, but keep them in mind if you prefer the Tremor’s rugged looks more than you’ll actually make use of its enhanced all-terrain capability. It’s also thirstier than the typical Maverick, and I averaged just 19 mpg across city, highway, and off-road use.

During my brief encounter with a muddy forest access road, the Tremor showed why someone might gladly sacrifice road handling for added trail readiness. Dedicated off-road modes help manage throttle calibration and ease steering sensitivity, while its chunky tires and clever all-wheel-drive system let you trudge through mud, sand, snow, or whatever else nature throws at you, without hesitation. There’s no denying that the Tremor package adds real capability to Ford’s bite-sized pickup truck, but this all still raised one big question in my mind: for even less money, one could just as easily purchase a larger, more capable, body-on-frame Ford Ranger, and if off-road use is the overriding priority, why would anyone opt for the Maverick over one of those? More on that later.

Shopping for a new car? Click here to get a great deal on your next vehicle. Powered by Carvana: no-haggle pricing, 100% online.

Technology: 8.0/10 — A New Data Plan, But Bring Your Own Charging Cable

Ford’s biggest tech addition for 2026 is a data plan. The Ford Connectivity Package includes a year of Wi-Fi hotspot data and connected navigation, with a seven-year option available. The 13.2-inch SYNC 4 touchscreen, eight-inch instrument display, and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto arrived with the 2025 refresh. I found the system generally straightforward, and wireless CarPlay worked effectively throughout the week. The B&O sound system was decent, too, making for a reasonably agreeable technology package overall. The drive modes also made palpable differences to the truck’s behavior, giving me useful ways to adjust its responses as conditions changed. Oddly, though, Ford has taken something away: wireless phone charging disappears for 2026. You can connect your phone to the system wirelessly, but you still need a cable to charge it. The Tremor keeps its 360-degree camera and Trail Control with Trail 1-Pedal Drive, though neither is new this year.

Exterior Design: 9.0/10 — The Maverick Has Been Raiding Its Big Brother’s Closet

Although I personally prefer the shiny gloss-black, dinner-plate wheels and lowered stance of the Maverick Lobo, the Tremor might be the meanest-looking pick of the litter. The truck’s recent facelift adds newly shaped headlights that freshen the overall look, and the Tremor-specific orange graphics pair well with those meaty all-terrain tires for a convincingly rugged aesthetic. Parked next to a Ranger or an F-150, the Maverick looks no less aggressive, only more compact. This Maverick is certainly no city slicker, even if its proportions might suggest otherwise.

Compared with the Hyundai Santa Cruz, the Maverick’s only real rival, the Ford looks unmistakably truckish. While the Santa Cruz looks more like a Hyundai Tucson with part of the rear lobbed off, the Maverick has the boxy, upright shape American buyers tend to associate more fondly with pickup-truck authenticity; myself included. Its design makes no compromises because it shares a CUV platform, whereas the Santa Cruz seems to. Even beyond looks, the Maverick seems to be one of the few domestic models that outweigh its Korean competition, most evident in sales: Ford moves roughly 8.35 Mavericks for every Hyundai Santa Cruz sold in the U.S. Clearly, buyers prefer the boxier shape here.

Interior Design & Quality: 7.0 — Does the Cabin Know What This Truck Costs?

I will gladly accept a simple interior in an affordable pickup, but the Tremor’s price makes the inexpensive materials harder to overlook. The truck’s tall stature delivers impressive headroom, but the cabin still feels cramped, and the upright seating position can become uncomfortable on longer drives. Rear legroom is particularly tight, but the bench is still more accommodating than the sideways jump seats found in some older compact pickups, and proper rear doors make access much easier than backward-opening half-doors.

Ford has, at least, been clever with storage. The rear-seat cushion flips up to reveal useful bins and create extra room for belongings inside the cabin. That flexibility is welcome when transporting items that must be sheltered from the weather. The passenger-space compromise also leaves room for a surprisingly useful bed. Its floor measures 54.4 inches against the Hyundai Santa Cruz’s 52.1—a 2.3-inch advantage. Bed volume is 33.3 cubic feet versus 27.0 in the Hyundai, giving the Ford another 6.3 cubic feet edge. So there’s obviously a worthwhile utility advantage here, even if rear passengers might wish Ford had allocated the space differently.

Pricing & Value: 6.5/10 — This Little Truck Has Expensive Hobbies

Although the Maverick lineup generally offers solid value, that’s not necessarily true of the trim-topping Tremor. The Santa Cruz XRT costs just $610 more than the Tremor and can tow up to 5,000 pounds when properly equipped, whereas the Tremor is limited to 2,000 pounds and up to 1,140 pounds of payload. Even a Maverick Hybrid AWD can tow 4,000 pounds with the optional 4K Tow Package, so buying the rugged Maverick involves some decidedly practical sacrifices.

All figures are in U.S. dollars, excluding taxes and additional options.

That brings me back to the Ranger. The mid-range XLT 4×4 starts $1,070 below the Tremor before destination, or $870 below it with delivery included. Add the $1,195 FX4 package and $535 Trailer Tow Package, and it reaches $43,200—only $860 above the Tremor. That buys a body-on-frame truck with low-range gearing, an electronic rear locker, additional underbody protection, a longer 59.6-inch bed, and up to 7,500 pounds of towing capability.

The Tremor does include heated seats, B&O audio, and a 360-degree camera, while that Ranger has cloth seats and fewer comfort features. The Maverick’s compact size also has value in tight parking spaces and on narrow access roads. For regular trail use, though, I would probably start shopping Rangers instead. For mostly road driving, the XLT Hybrid AWD saves $7,780 before further options and makes a more economical daily driver with friendlier road manners. That leaves the Tremor serving a narrow demographic: someone who needs the extra traction hardware, specifically wants the compact footprint, and accepts its reduced work capacity. I get the appeal, but it isn’t where I’d put my own money.

The Real Verdict: 7.3/10 — I Still Want a Maverick, but I’d Spend My Money Differently

After a week with the Tremor, I remembered why I fell for the Maverick in the first place. This little pickup has plenty of character, and its useful bed, clever storage, and manageable dimensions make a convincing case for keeping your truck purchase small. The Tremor adds worthwhile traction hardware, an entertaining turbocharged engine, and enough cosmetic toughness to make me glance back after parking it. But choosing this particular Maverick requires accepting several substantial compromises. Noisier tires, less composed handling, and disappointing fuel consumption affect everyday driving, while the cabin’s inexpensive materials are harder to excuse at this price. Its reduced towing capacity also makes the toughest-looking Maverick a less useful truck for some buyers.

For my money, an all-wheel-drive Maverick Hybrid still seems like the most appealing daily companion. If regular trail use were a priority, I’d give a Ranger XLT 4×4 with the FX4 package a serious look before signing up for the Tremor. So there’s really only one reason to choose this truck: you insist upon the Maverick’s compact dimensions and will actually use its added off-road capability often. For that buyer, the Tremor has a real purpose, but otherwise, it feels a bit superficial. I’d happily recommend the Maverick to almost anyone; I’d just need to know more about their weekends before I’d recommend the Tremor.

Autoblog aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.

A Crowning Achievement

Conventional car wisdom says a family crossover has to be big, but in real life, that’s not always the case. Sometimes, it’s about making city driving unencumbered, saving on fuel costs, and simplifying the user experience. Yet it also has to be able to cosset two to three kids and be practical enough to swallow groceries and gear without needing to be cavernous.

That’s the appeal of the 2027 Toyota Crown Signia. My time in the 2027 Toyota Crown Limited proved that the biggest isn’t always the best. It combines a comfortable cabin and useful cargo area with a hybrid powertrain and standard all-wheel drive. It’s certainly not the quickest, flashiest, or the roomiest, but it still has a lot to offer. The Limited’s base price is $51,555. After adding special Finish Line Red exterior paint with a contrasting black roof and the $1,595 destination charge, the total price comes to $53,725.

Exterior & Interior Styling – 9/10

Toyota calls the Crown Signia an SUV, but its shape, stance, and ride height lean more towards the station wagon ilk than more upright and boxier competitors. The Crown Signia’s handsome maw gets a body-colored lattice grille, Prius-like lighting elements, and an overall better appearance than its Crown sedan sibling. The long roof, relatively low stance, and gently tapering rear give it an elegant, Lexus-like profile.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

Speaking of the sedan, the rear third of that car doesn’t look nearly as good as the one found on the Crown Signia. It’s long roofline, roof spoiler, canted D-pillar, and muscular haunches complete the look cohesively. It also lacks the weird two-tone babooon butt of the sedan.

The cabin, like the exterior profile, might as well be a Lexus. My test vehicle combined perforated Saddle Tanleather, satin-finished trim, copper-colored details, and attractive switchgear in an environment that felt decidedly more upscale than a typical mainstream Toyota. The layered dash, half-waterfall center console, and the two-tone colorway provide a degree of sophistication oftentimes missing from comparably priced crossovers.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

The stylized door card is thoughtful, and the bisected front outboard HVAC bents are a thing of beauty. It isn’t a Lexus in every detail. Nevertheless, buyers who care more about what they touch and see than having an “L” emblem on the steering wheel should find a lot to love. It’s understated luxury, and it whispers rather than screams. Maybe BMW could use some of these cues for their next generation of vehicles.

Thinking about selling your car? Get an instant cash offer online now. Click here to get started.

Infotainment & Technology – 8.5/10

The Crown Signia demonstrates that large screens don’t have to overwhelm an interior. Okay, so they’re not diminutive. I’d say more “right-sized” is the proper term. A 12.3-inch central touchscreen and a matching digital instrument display match the interior’s elegant simplicity. The Crown Signia’s touchscreen has a crisp and simple vertical menu, making finding the right function quick and easy.

In my Limited, the infotainment system responded promptly, smartphone pairing was quick, and the interface was easy to understand. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto comes standard, and phone mirroring never presented any hangups upon startup. I also liked the instrument display’s relatively straightforward presentation. It conveyed useful driving and hybrid-system information without burying key info beneath flashy graphics.

The 2027 Limited comes with a comprehensive collection of driver-assistance technology, including a panoramic-view camera, lane-change assistance, front cross-traffic alert, and front and rear parking assistance with automatic braking. Traffic Jam Assist and a 360 camera are now standard on the Limited. although it requires the applicable connected-services subscription.

Comfort, Space, and Usability – 9/10

The Crown Signia isn’t huge inside, but it is very comfortable. The front seats in my Limited were broad and supportive, with a good amount of cushioniong and solid bolstering. Heated and ventilated front seats, heated rear outboard positions, and a heated steering wheel added the comfort features I wanted for changing Chicago seasons.

Rear legroom measures 37.1 inches. It’s a little less than the roomy Toyota Camry. It was sufficient me (6’0″, 200 lbs) to sit behind myself but not enough for me to stretch out. The seats are very comfortable in the outboard positions.The middle position is a little compromised with seat and transmission tunnel bulge, but it’s fine for shorter trips.

The Crown Signia provides 24.8 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 66.1 cubic feet with them folded. During a week involving three kids, school activities, sports equipment, and groceries, I never felt as though the vehicle was struggling to take on stuff. It’s just right for a family of five, as long as the kids aren’t linebackers.

Storage is good but not outstanding. The center armest door opens to either side, and the charging deck swallows an iPhone 16 Pro no problem. I love its location and space-saving vertical design. The door pockets are small-ish, so don’t bring massive thermal water bottles or long items into the front row.

View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article

The physical controls in the Crown Signia are superb. The Lexus shift knob is short and quick to operate, and the center console buttons and switches are quick to access and operate. I appreciate the presence of a center audio knob and a line of buttons and switches for climate. None of them are haptic feedback or touch sensitive, and the Crown Signia deserves high marks for that.

Driving Experience – 7.5/10

The Crown Signia’s driving character won’t get your blood pumping, but that’s not what it’s designed to do. The 2.5-liter four-cylinder hybrid system produces 238 horsepower, with electronic on-demand all-wheel drive standard. The dual electric motors (a front transaxle electric drive motor and a dedicated rear-mounted electric motor) kick in when needed. Toyota lists an EPA-estimated 38 mpg combined. I averaged 35.1 mpg during my test, with some of it spent in Sport mode.

It feels decently quick off the line, and low-speed response was smooth. It’s best suited for cruising and suburban traffic. Steering is light and accurate but, unsurprisingly, without feedback. For the most part, it was quiet, and the powertrain generally stayed unobtrusive during regular driving. Hammer the throttle, and the engine and CVT make themselves known. It could get moving adequately; it simply didn’t make hard acceleration especially immediate and fun. This is a family car, through and through, and that’s more than ok.

The Crown Signia’s lower ride height made body movement controlled, if not taut. The Crown Signia’s ride quality is, well, Lexus-like. The suspension took the edge off rough pavement without making the vehicle feel disconnected, and road and wind noise were well contained at highway speeds. It’s another reason to love it as a family car.

Final Verdict – 8.75/10

The 2027 Toyota Crown Signia deserves consideration because it does family remarkably well. Everyone with two or three kids thinks he needs a mammoth SUV or a three-row midsize crossover. The Crown Signia proves you can downsize and love it. My time behind the wheel left me impressed by its usability in everyday life. It sips fuel, doesn’t require tons of parking corrections due to its size, and its controls and tech are very easy. It’s no corner carver, nor is it a disappointment in daily driving. The Crown Signia about as relaxed of a driving experience as you can expect at this price.

“Affordable” is a Relative Term Here

“Affordable” requires some context when the subject is a Mercedes-AMG wagon with a $93,350 base price. My test vehicle approached $112,000 with options and destination, which puts it well beyond anything resembling an everyday family-car budget. But against the BMW M5 Touring and Audi RS 6 Avant Performance, the 2026 Mercedes-AMG E 53 Hybrid Wagon makes a convincing case as the comparatively attainable member of a very exclusive club.

It doesn’t match those ballistic wagons in outright power, but its combination of a turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six and electric motor produces 577 horsepower. Mercedes quotes a four-second sprint to 60 mph, and its 41 miles of electric range give it another dimension beyond the usual fast-wagon formula. You can enjoy its performance on the weekend without necessarily firing up the engine for every weekday errand.

After spending time behind the wheel, I found a lot to love and some glaring issues. This is a quick, sophisticated wagon that makes carrying people and cargo feel considerably more special than it does in most SUVs. Unfortunately, the details that separate a desirable performance car from a great daily driver aren’t all here.

Exterior & Interior Styling – 9/10

The E 53 Hybrid Wagon looks great. It’s sleek, properly menacing, and even a bit sexy compared to the more brutalist M5 Touring. It certainly attracted attention during my time with it. One gentleman parked his C-Class next to it and ogled it for a few minutes. The AMG GT-style grille with the requisite frisbee-sized tri-star emblem look fantastic, flanked by curvaceous headlight clusters and big lower intakes. The body isn’t overstyled and retains the elegance of the E-Class while adding touches like black window surrounds, black multi-spoke wheels, and red brake calipers.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

I love the clean and steeply raked D-pillar that terminates in a simple but attractive rear end. The E-Class’s tri-star quad taillights, black quad exhaust tips, and sublte roof spoiler finish off the E 53’s Hybrid Wagon handsome exterior. I think it looks better, more cohesive than the sedan. People are definitely taking notice of these premium wagons, and it gives me hope in the return of the segment as a whole.

The cabin delivers a similarly strong first impression. It’s opulent, richly presented, and thoroughly committed to the idea that a modern luxury car should also serve as a technology showcase. My tester’s optional MBUX Superscreen gave the dashboard an especially elaborate appearance. For me, it’s a bit too much tech, but it certainly looks premium. More on that later.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

The materials inside the E 53 Hybrid Wagon are top tier. Rich suede and leather, matte wood, and high-grade metallic surfaces abound. Red stitching all over the cabin add to its sportiness, and there are even red seat belts. The only blunder is the use of piano black on the haptic feedback steering wheel controls, which have their own usability issues.

Technology, Controls, User Experience – 8/10

The standard display arrangement includes a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster and a 14.4-inch central touchscreen. The optional MBUX Superscreen adds a 12.3-inch front-passenger display, creating a colossal digital presentation across the dashboard that almost totally dominates the cabin. The larger issue is how much interaction Mercedes routes through screens and touch-sensitive controls. MBUX’s menus are an improvement over the previous iteration, but basic adjustments still divert too much attention from the road.

An available 3D instrument display adds another layer of visual punch, although I didn’t notice it immediatley. The effect is difficult to convey in photographs because it’s something the driver experiences from behind the wheel. It looks slick, but it’s wholly unnecessary.

Climate functions are a good example. Accessing temperature adjustments and related settings requires tapping the lower portion of the display and working through the interface. It’s an unnecessarily involved process for something drivers should be able to manage with minimal distraction.

Audio controls are even more frustrating. There’s no conventional volume knob, and the touch-sensitive slider below the screen proved difficult to use precisely. Sometimes an input produced a larger change than I wanted; other times, it barely seemed to register. The small slider on the steering wheel wasn’t much better. A physical volume knob would improve the daily experience more than a massive display or an additional passenger display.

Comfort and Space – 8.5/10

A fast family wagon needs to handle the family shuttling as well as it handles highways and backroads. This is where the E 53’s appeal became diminished for me. The front seats are superb with the right balance of cushioning and bolstering. Adjustability is excellent, despite the door-mounted controls. The suede inserts are grippy, and the headrests move forward and back, a nice touch that adds another level of comfort.

The rear outboard seats are comfortable, but the space around them isn’t especially generous. With a front occupant taller than six feet, the person behind has limited room to stretch out. Rear legroom is 36.2 inches, accompanied by 37.6 inches of headroom. Those figures are comparable to the M5 Touring’s, but the RS 6 Avant offers more room in both measurements.The center position is the bigger disappointment. A substantial center tunnel and the rear climate-control console consume much of the available foot space.

My test vehicle also lacked heated rear seats. At nearly $112,000, that omission felt Merc was nickel and diming. I would give up the fancy speaker grilles just to have this. Buyers should verify availability on the specific model year and vehicle they’re considering rather than assume a six-figure sticker means you automatically get this.

Cargo space is more than commendable in the E 53. It’s not as capacious as a GLE SUV, but it’s solid with 33.1 cubic feet behind the rear seats and up to 64.6 cubic feet with them folded. More important than just the numbers, its low, wide load floor makes loading heavy items and reaching farther into the compartment easier than in a taller SUV. The rear-seat accommodations might require some compromises, but the cargo area delivers the everyday versatility that makes this fast wagon so appealing.

Driving Experience – 9/10

The E 53 is quick and maneuverable. It doesn’t scare you the way the 717-hp BMW M5 Touring does, but the 577 horsepower from its inline-six and electric motor delivers performance that lands between composed and nutty. The transmission shifts quickly, and the car gets to 60 in four seconds. That’s properly quick, and the brakes are progressive and strong.

The combination of adaptive suspension, rear-axle steering, and all-wheel drive gives this wagon the ingredients for an engaging, daily manageable driving experience. It offers a persuasive alternative to an SUV for someone who also wants to fun behind the wheel. The E 53 Hybrid Wagon more than delivers. The quoted 41 miles of electric range is a boon for commuters, and that range is real. I was able to extract almost 40 miles before the battery was depleted.

Final Verdict – 8.75/10

The 2026 Mercedes-AMG E 53 Hybrid Wagon gets close to being the complete package. It’s fast, visually stunning, luxurious, and capable of handling some everyday driving on electricity. Against its high-performance wagon rivals, its lower starting price makes it even more appealing. But “less expensive” doesn’t mean inexpensive, and a nearly $112,000 test vehicle still invites more scrutiny beyond its performance and looks. It has to be family-friendly and quick to operate. It seems all three premium superwagons could use a lesson here. That said, the E 53 Hybrid Wagon is a worthy member of the German triumvirate, and I’d rather it exist with flaws than not exist at all.

It Has Dual Purpose Work Cut Out For It

I’m a suburban dad with three kids. My wife and I both own Mazdas, a CX-9 and a Mazda6. Someday, I’ll own a rear-wheel drive, manual transmission sporty car again, but that’s probably when the kids are gone and I’m retired. My wife and I also consider buying a vehicle for overlanding, and I may have found it. The qualifier is that any vehicle chosen for this purpose must also work as a family vehicle to eventually replace our CX-9, while adding the ability to do the rough stuff when necessary.

The 2026 Land Rover Defender 130 X brings those two worlds together beautifully. It combines three-row seating with a 395-horsepower inline-six with mild hybrid assist, standard air suspension, and serious four-wheel-drive hardware. This isn’t simply a family SUV with a rugged look. It has the goods to do what most SUV owners never will.

My tester’s base price was already substantial at $105,000. With the $1,850 destination charge and options like the Cold Climate Pack, Towing Pack, and heated second row Captain’s Chairs, the total price arrived at $110,010.

Exterior & Interior Styling – 9.75/10

I’ll admit that the 130 isn’t the best-looking version of the Defender. That superlative belongs to the well-proportioned 110. The 90 looks like two-thirds of a Defender. The 130 looks a little ungainly due to the added 13.3 inches of length. It has the same wheelbase as the 110, but that extended tail section makes it seem almost hearse-like. That said, I still love the Defender’s unapologetic uprightness, boxy body, and purpose-built look. The 130 X’s Woolstone Green Paint and black trim pieces might just be the perfect combination. For my family the longer back is what could make ownership a reality.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

The cabin is even better than the exterior. It’s a wonderful combination of physical controls, rugged materials, and utilitarian design. None of it looks or feels overdone or chintzy, and it feels like the kind of luxury SUV you’d actually feel okay beating up a litle with mud, camping gear, and kids. The beefy steering wheel, chunky dashboard, integrated grab handles, and huge cubbies give the Defender the right vibe for town and country. It’s refined without pointless decoration and rugged without overkill.

I’m utterly fascinated by the powdercoated steering wheel spokes and similarly tactile center console. I don’t know any other vehicle that uses this, and it’s wonderful. Sure, there’s no wood in here, but who cares? The plastics, metal trim pieces, and leather are all handsome and high-quality. It all comes together in a cabin that matches the exterior.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

I have to confess that when the new Defender came out in 2020, I was skeptical about its newfangled interior. I thought it would be to posh and too complex, but the result is a near perfect execution of form following function. Land Rover should absolutely take some of this and slide it into the overly minimalist cabin of the top dog Range Rover, which is challenging to use quickly. The Defender’s interior is one of the best I’ve experienced, and it’s one you won’t be afraid to dirty up on occasion.

Infotainment & Technology – 8.25/10

For 2026, the Defender gets a standard 13.1-inch infotainment touchscreen running its Pivi Pro interface. The larger curved screen replaces the previous 11.4-inch display. A 12.3-inch configurable instrument display handles the driver’s information, while wireless Apple CarPlay, wireless Android Auto, and wireless phone charging cover the everyday essentials. The system works well, but the main menu takes some adjustment due to the layout and similar coloring. I didn’t score the same system as high in the Range Rover, but that’s largely because of said vehicle’s lack of accompanying physical controls.

The instrument display is one of my favorites because it looks genuinely analog. The brushed matte surfaces of the gauges appear to have texture, and the font is a nice blend of modern and classic. Other tech features include surround-view and ground-view camera functions that help with vehicle placement, and an available digital rearview mirror can maintain a useful view when passengers or cargo block the rear window.

Shopping for a new car? Click here to get a great deal on your next vehicle. Powered by Carvana: no-haggle pricing, 100% online.

Comfort, Space, and Usability – 9.5/10

The interior of the 130 X is superb. The seating upholstery employs both Windsor leather on the seating surfaces and something called Kvadrat, a premium wool-blend textile, on the side trim. It has texture and can handle more rigors than leather. The seating materials are a combination of refinement and ruggedness, and the formula works.

The front seats are very supportive and the right amount of cushioning. The Captain’s chairs are similarly comfy, and both rear rows can house real adults. The massive opening between the Captain’s Chairs makes third-row access minivan-like. The third row seats have nice level cushions, and even the middle position is comfortable. 31.7 inches of legroom back there is solid. All three rows of the 130 X come with standard heated seats, while the front row also gets ventilation.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

Although the cabin is largely utilitarian, the Defender 130 X has great standard amenities like a panoramic sunroof, a power tilt/telescoping steering wheel, configurable cabin lighting, a crisp head-up display, and a booming 700W Meridian Surround Sound System.

Cargo space in the 130 is generous. With just the third row folded flat, there’s 28.4 cubic feet of space. I was able to load it up with gobs of camping gear and firewood and didn’t even need to fold row two down to do so. With the third row in place, there are 15.3 cubic feet behind it. It’s not a lot of room, but I was able to fit 7 full grocery bags across its width. Fold all rows down, and the Defender 130 provides 89 cubes.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

The Defender lineup has some of the best physical controls in the segment. I love bent nail shift knob. It has a mechanical feel, although it returns to the same position each time. The climate control knobs with digital readouts and seat heat/ventilation are excellent. Once you get used to the location of the other buttons for climate, traction control, ride height, etc., it all becomes easy to use. The rear cliamte control knobs are just like the ones for the front row. The control pads and switches on the steering wheel for adaptive cruise control and audio also work very well, making it easy to control while driving.

Driving Experience – 8.5/10

When it comes to a family SUV with solid off-road chops, I don’t require gobs of horsepower. I’d rather have comfortable and roomy accomodations instead of 500+ horsepower. The P400 powertrain feels like the sweet spot for the 130 X. Its 3.0-liter mild-hybrid inline-six produces 395 horsepower and 406 lb-ft of torque, paired with an eight-speed automatic and four-wheel drive. 0-to-60 mph happens in the low-six-second range, and it’s plenty of performance for a large SUV that weighs nearly 6,000 pounds.

The result is strong acceleration and smooth shifts, while cruising at 75+ mph highway speeds feels pretty effortless. There’s a little lag off the the line, but it’s quick once it gets going. There’s good steering effort, and its very accurate. The largest Defender is tall and hefty, so managing turns takes a little bit of planning. Standard air suspension and Adaptive Dynamics work wonders, and ride comfort is superb over broken pavement and gaps.

Some might criticize the Defender’s use of unibody (vs. body-on-frame) construction, but it’s rigid as hell without sacrificing comfort. Low-range gearing and Terrain Response 2 wiht Off-Road Modes give the X equipment that goes well beyond rugged styling. I didn’t take it on any serious trails, but dirt roads with divots and drops when I took my boys camping were dispatched with virtually no effort.

Final Verdict – 9.5/10

The Defender line is tremendously good. It manages to do utility, luxury, and style in almost equal measures, and the 130 X makes it very family-friendly. In the entire Land Rover lineup, it’s my favorite vehicle, and one of my favorite rugged SUVs. There’s not much it can’t do, although its added length diminshes the departure angle. On road, it remains surprisingly comfortable and composed. For the family, there are few competitors that can manage the toughness of the Defender 130 X. I’m putting this one on the short list for my family.

It’s hard to overstate the Volkswagen GTI’s legendary reputation in the pantheon of automotive history. Just like the Mazda Miata’s status as the quintessential roadster, the GTI is the defining hot hatch. It’s now in its second year without the beloved manual transmission, which means this formula isn’t quite the same as before. Nevertheless, the GTI brings the performance goods like a 241 horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder engine, a 7-speed dual clutch automatic transmission, a limited-slip differential, sharp variable-ratio electro-mechanical steering, and impeccable handling. It’s a car that’s meant to be driven, even though purists might walk away from it in its current form. That doesn’t mean they’ll walk towards the upcoming electric version.

My test vehicle was a top trim 2026 Golf GTI Autobahn with a starting price of $42,480. Standard feature highlights included 19″ alloy wheels with summer performance tires, LED automatic headlights, adaptive front lighting system, multi-mode DCC adaptive chassis control, power folding/heated mirrors with memory/puddle lights, panoramic sunroof, rear roof spoiler, leather seats, heated/ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, heated leather sport steering wheel, ambient lighting, head-up display, 12.9″ touchscreen, Harman Kardon premium audio w/ subwoofer, wireless charging, and wireless smartphone integration. With options and the $1,275 destination charge, the total price came to $44,210.

Exterior Styling – 9/10

The Golf GTI is one of the most recognizable vehicles in automotive history. Its two-box hatchback shape continues to look sharp, attractive, and consistent with the same essential look over generations. With ongoing changes to its front and rear fascias, lighting, body creases, etc., its essential shape has stood the test of time, and you’d have to be a car idiot to not know the GTI and the Golf on which its based. In 2025, the GTI received new headlights and taillights to keep it fresh, but the rest of the vehicle remains largely the same, meaning handsome.

VW makes occasional tweaks to the GTI, but it’s wise to have kept it from being overstyled. Flourishes like the honeycomb lower grille with its integrated fog lights and the new wheels 5-hole wheels that nod to the Mk6 GTI’s “salad shooter” style wheels. These look better and scrapes will be less noticeable due to the elimination of the original’s flat faces. The body has crisp lines, perfect overhangs, nary a hint of chrome, and the easily-recognizable C-pillar. It’s a formula that’s pretty much never wrong. VW should offer its design consulting services to the team that designed the current Subaru WRX.

Interior Style and Comfort – 8/10

Now, to the interior, which isn’t commensurate with the exterior or with the GTI’s legendary road manners. Although it has racy-looking sport seats, and a great black/grey/red colorway to match the exterior, the cabin looks and feels cheap for the $44k asking price. The modern lines on the dash and center console work well, but the overuse of hard plastics and the fingerprint-happy piano black plastic do the GTI’s cabin a disservice.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

Details like the red stitching, aluminum sport pedals, and perforated upholstery fit the bill, but the unimaginative and plasticky door cards leave much to be desired. For what is, effectively, a premium hot hatch, the touchpoints on the door armrests and the center console armrest, as well as the shifter surround, feel hard and low grade. When Hyundai, Kia, and Mazda do this better on cheaper models, it’s just wrong.

The front seats are supportive but a bit on the firm side for my liking. On the top Autobahn trim, heated leather seats are standard. The rear seats provide 35 inches of legroom, which is surprisingly roomy for a compact hatchback. Its closest competitor provides quite a bit less. The GR Corolla has 29.9 inches of rear legroom.

Infotainment, Controls, User Experience – 7.5/10

For the GTI’s 7th generation, its Achilles heels has always been its overdone infotainment system. The 12.9″ center touchscreen seems oversized for a driver-focused hot hatch. The problem isn’t just the screen size but the overdependence on it for the most basic controls. Yes, it has climate and audio sliders below it (finally backlit), but the sliders are horrendously bad to use while driving. It’s like doing an adult coloring book while on a carnival ride. Would a few knobs kill them?

In an effort to make its interiors more modern and minimalist, VW has complicated simple operations. Menu diving continues to impede a good user experience, and the lack of switchgear distracts from the GTI’s driver-focused mission. Aeast the steering wheel controls are no longer haptic feedback as of 2025. They’re far easier to use and don’t pick up smudges like the old ones. It’s a small victory but not nearly enough.

The Driving Experience – 9/10

I’m generally not a fan of front-wheel drive sporty cars, but the GTI is just so well-balanced and responsive. It’s not just the turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder producing 241 horsepower and 273 lb-ft of torque that thrills, but the quick-shifting seven-speed DSG dual-clutch automatic. Although the GTI isn’t as engaging without the manual, the DSG’s responsive programming keeps the GTI connected and quick. Sport mode adopts a more aggressive shift strategy, and steering-wheel paddles let the driver take control when a winding road calls for greater involvement. That said, it’s no replacement for a three pedal setup.

The Autobahn’s handling is equally compelling, combining quick, direct steering with a balanced chassis and a limited-slip differential that helps the front tires put power down effectively when exiting corners. Standard summer tires provide substantial grip, while the adaptive dampers keep body motions tidy while maintaining composure over rough pavement. It’s more compliant than a WRX in everyday driving.

The steering’s precision makes the GTI easy to place through successive bends, although drivers who prefer more effort may find it a little light even in Sport mode. Strong braking performance and reassuring pedal response round out a driving experience that feels agile and composed but still ready for everyday driving. It’s one of those cars that makes you come up with excuses to go out and toss around, even if it’s just through the neighborhood.

Final Thoughts

It’s possible to really love the GTI, even without the manual transmission. I lament that loss like a bad breakup, but the GTI still thrills. A return to a more analog experience inside would vastly improve the user experience, but that’s unlikely to happen in this generation. I celebrate the fact that the GTI continues to exist in a world of boring crossovers.

The 2027 Maserati GranCabrio is remarkably rewarding to drive, beautiful to look at, and capable of making an ordinary trip feel like an occasion. I wanted to avoid saying something like “it’s what dreams are made of,” but there’s a personal reason that particular cliché keeps creeping into my head. When I was a kid, my father managed to horse-trade his way into a used 1971 Maserati Indy. That car introduced me to Italian automotive design, sound, and the understanding that transportation could involve considerably more emotion than practicality.

View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article

It was already an older car, but those weekend drives lit a fire that has yet to go out. Decades later, the GranCabrio and its fixed-roof cousin, the GranTurismo, bring back some of that feeling. Fortunately, this isn’t simply nostalgia doing the heavy lifting. My GranCabrio Trofeo had an exceptionally persuasive argument under its hood.

Powertrain and performance

The Trofeo’s 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged Nettuno V6 produces 582 horsepower and 479 pound-feet of torque. That’s a 40-horsepower increase over the previous model year. Maserati’s patented pre-chamber combustion technology has motorsport roots, while cylinder deactivation helps manage fuel consumption when you aren’t exercising all those Italian horses. There’s no hybrid system here, just a muscular engine with a rather enthusiastic exhaust.

An eight-speed automatic sends power through a rear-biased all-wheel-drive system, with an electronically controlled limited-slip rear differential helping put it down. Maserati claims 0–60 mph in 3.4 seconds and a 196-mph maximum. The Trofeo also gets standard staggered forged wheels measuring 20 inches up front and 21 inches at the rear. This is serious performance hardware beneath a body that looks perfectly happy parked outside an expensive lunch.

The transmission isn’t a dual-clutch unit, but its quick shifts suit the engine beautifully. Acceleration feels immediate and sustained, accompanied by an exhaust note that makes the corners of your mouth rise involuntarily. Some cars need simulated sound to manufacture excitement. This one appears to have hired an angry Italian tenor.

Ride and handling

What impressed me most wasn’t simply the speed. It was the GranCabrio’s ability to settle down when I stopped asking for it. In GT mode, the ride is comfortable enough to support the grand-touring promise. Select Sport or Corsa, and the car becomes more insistent, with sharper responses and a considerably less discreet soundtrack. Standard adjustable air suspension helps reconcile those personalities.

Despite the large cabin opening, the structure feels stout through the corners. I didn’t get the impression that the front and rear were debating separate travel plans. Steering response is precise, and the weighting feels appropriate, although I would appreciate more feedback through the wheel. The car tells you where it’s going clearly enough; I simply wanted a little more conversation about the pavement.

This is still a substantial four-seat convertible, so expecting lightweight roadster behavior would be unreasonable. Nevertheless, it changes direction with confidence, and its rear-biased character keeps the experience entertaining. More importantly, it doesn’t demand that you drive aggressively to enjoy it. A relaxed coastal cruise can be just as rewarding as a winding road.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

Exterior and interior design

I haven’t loved every Maserati convertible from the past few decades. Some looked a little too bulky or overly concerned with announcing their grille. The current GranCabrio gets the proportions right: a long hood, flowing shoulders, sculpted flanks, and a neatly resolved rear incorporating four exhaust outlets. The updated nose sharpens the appearance without overwhelming the rest of the car.

Related: BMW vs. Lexus vs. Mercedes-Benz: Which Brand Has the Happiest Owners?

It looks expensive without appearing desperate to prove it. That’s an increasingly rare skill.

Inside, the material quality and overall fit impressed me. My test car’s bright contrasting stitching drew mixed reactions, but it didn’t bother me. There are plenty of ways to personalize one, and I would rather see somebody exercise a little imagination than order another six-figure vehicle in Accountant Gray.

View the 4 images of this gallery on the original article

The back seats also deserve attention. These are usable accommodations rather than upholstered suggestions. Average-size passengers can fit, provided those up front cooperate with seat positioning. I wouldn’t put an NBA center back there, but bringing friends along is a realistic proposition. That gives the GranCabrio a useful distinction from strictly two-seat roadsters.

Luggage requires more discipline. Maserati lists approximately 6 cubic feet of trunk capacity for the combustion models, with less space available when the roof is lowered. Pack soft bags and leave the oversized suitcase at home. The fabric roof opens in approximately 14 seconds and closes in around 16, and it can operate at speeds up to 31 mph. Standard Trofeo neck warmers help extend the open-air season.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

Infotainment system conundrum

The cabin’s screen arrangement includes a 12.3-inch central touchscreen and an 8.8-inch lower comfort display, alongside a separate digital instrument cluster. The layout looks sophisticated, but looking sophisticated and being convenient are two different assignments.

My main complaint involves the relationship between the lower touchscreen and the push-button gear selector. Reaching for a gear with my ham-fisted mitts occasionally resulted in an unintended climate adjustment. I wanted Drive, not a warmer backside. The buttons are attractive, but I would happily exchange some visual drama for a conventional gear lever and dedicated climate controls.

Related: Bugatti CEO Says a Manual, 986-HP Tourbillon Is Possible

The touchscreen roof operation also feels unnecessarily fussy. Having to locate and slide an on-screen control requires more attention than I think this task deserves. A proper switch would do nicely. The Android-based operating system isn’t inherently a problem for an iPhone owner; my frustration concerns the interface and control placement.

Final thoughts

Maserati lists the 2027 GranCabrio Trofeo from $176,200, before destination and options. That’s serious money, and personalization can push the total well beyond $200,000. The broader lineup offers a 483-horsepower gasoline version, while the electric Folgore delivers 751 horsepower for buyers who want their Italian grand tourer with a charging cable.

For me, the Trofeo supplies the right combination. It’s fast, comfortable, attractive, and engaging without requiring constant effort. The screens need refinement, and nobody will mistake the trunk for a family vacation solution, but those shortcomings don’t extinguish its appeal.

My father’s Indy taught me that a car could make an ordinary weekend feel special. The GranCabrio Trofeo understands that assignment. Fortunately, it also brings 582 horsepower to class.

Related: Genesis GV70 vs. Maserati Grecale: Sensible Luxury Meets Italian Temptation

A Brand Renaissance

Back in 2023, Infiniti talked about a “brand renaissance” that would reinvigorate sales. It started with the QX80, the company’s flagship SUV, which carries into the 2026 and 2027 model years mostly unchanged. Infiniti will likely refresh the QX80 in the next year or two, but even the current car is pretty competitive in the full-size luxury class.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

The QX80 was the first Infiniti to debut the brand’s latest “Artistry in Motion” design language, which has further evolved with models like the QX65. Infiniti knows how to design a handsome car, and after spending a week in the top QX80 Autograph trim, I learned it still knows how to compete with the class leaders.

Luxurious & Practical

The Infiniti QX80 is heavily based on the Nissan Armada, known in other parts of the world as the Patrol. This platform delivers capable off-road prowess, though it’s less spacious than American options like the Cadillac Escalade, Lincoln Navigator, and Jeep Grand Wagoneer. These vehicles also offer extended wheelbase variants that offer even more cargo volume.

The QX80 offers up to 101 cubic feet of space with the second- and third-row seats folded, but it can still deliver that practicality even in its most luxurious trim. If you opt for massaging second row seats in the Escalade or Navigator (they aren’t available in the Grand Wagoneer), you lose the ability to fold them flat, severely limiting cargo space. The QX80 is the only vehicle in this segment with rear seats that massage you, but can still fold flat to fit a flat screen TV.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

Enough Screens

Both the Escalade and Navigator have recently been facelifted with fresh interiors that feature massive screens stretching across the dashboard. Some tech-forward buyers will love the flexibility for apps and widgets in these models, while traditional customers may be overwhelmed by the number of screens.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

The QX80 gets it just right, pairing two 14.3-inch displays with a lower climate control touchscreen. If you prefer buttons, the Armada still offers them, but the QX80’s separate climate screen is useful for quickly adjusting settings like temperature without the need to leave CarPlay or other main screen tasks.

Heart Of A Sports Car

I still think the Escalade is the standard by which all vehicles in this segment should be judged for ride and handling. It’s still a body-on-frame vehicle, but GM’s excellent Magnetic Ride Control delivers the most comfortable ride in this class. The Escalade is also the last vehicle in the segment to offer a V8 engine, but it’s no longer my favorite amongst the competitive set.

• 2024 Cadillac Escalade-V: 4.76 seconds
• 2026 Lincoln Navigator Black Label: 5.65 seconds
• 2025 Lexus LX 700h Overtrail: 5.72 seconds
• 2026 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Summit: 6.17 seconds
• 2026 Infiniti QX80 Autograph: 6.24 seconds
• 2025 Cadillac Sport Platinum: 6.68 seconds

Infiniti now uses a 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V6, which is essentially a bigger version of the 3.0-liter version in the Nissan Z sports car. It produces 450 horsepower and 516 lb-ft in the QX80, going out via a nine-speed automatic transmission. I’ve tested the zero to 60 mph times for several vehicles in this segment, and the QX80 is pretty quick. This Autograph trim hit 60 mph in 6.24 seconds, which is quicker than the last V8 Escalade I tested.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

Infiniti has teased a performance variant of the QX80 with more power, but it has been delayed to ensure it offers a substantial upgrade over the base model. While I’d like to see the QX80 get over 600 hp, it’s pretty great as-is.

It’s Cadillac’s electric era.

For generations, the name Cadillac has come to be a name that is synonymous with the American luxury car. From the Coupe DeVilles and Sixty Specials of the 50s and 60s to today’s modern marvels like the full-size Escalade SUV, Cadillac has defined itself as a brand committed to cars that offer both smooth-riding comfort and bold, stylish presence. 

These days, it seems that the future of motoring is defined in large part by electrification. EVs, plug-ins and hybrid-electric vehicles have become the center of attention in today’s new-car market. In sharp contrast to its gas-guzzling image, Cadillac entered the EV arena in 2022 with the Lyriq, a boldly-styled mid-size crossover SUV that pit itself against industry rivals like the Tesla Model Y. 

Since its release, Cadillac has experienced an electric renaissance. In late 2024, the Lyriq was recognized as the German Car of the Year in the luxury category, and in May 2025, the brand surpassed more than 100,000 sales. In the interim, Cadillac slowly expanded its EV lineup with SUVs of all sizes like the smaller Optiq, the three-row Vistiq, the Escalade IQ, as well as the six-figure, ultra-limited Celestiq halo sedan. While the EV market has expanded since its debut, the 2027 model year iteration of the Cadillac Lyriq shows that it has still carved a distinct place for itself among other electric midsize luxury SUVs including the BMW iX, the Mercedes EQE and Volvo EX60.

View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article

“What is that, an Escalade?” 

Off the bat, one of the biggest things I love about the Cadillac Lyriq is its styling. In today’s crowded EV marketplace, I feel that it is one of the biggest strengths it has against its direct competitors. Many contemporary premium EVs, including the Tesla Model Y, Mercedes EQE and EQS and even the $560,800 Ferrari have adopted this sort of smooth, formless ‘blob’-shape that some have likened to a jelly bean. You know what it looks like — mentioning those model names triggers something that enthusiasts have burned into their heads; whether on purpose or involuntarily. However, the Lyriq’s pronounced, concept car-esqe curves and chiseled lines gives it a look that can be best described as distinctly Cadillac. 

View the 5 images of this gallery on the original article

Cadillac’s design expertise is best shown in how its designers have handled the front end of the Lyriq. While competitors like Tesla with the Model Y and Ferrari with the Luce have completely done away with traditional grilles, and Mercedes’ stylists have struggled to integrate a grille on an electric vehicle without an internal combustion engine, Cadillac has seemed to have found a balance. Although the Lyriq does not feature a practical or usable front trunk like the Escalade IQ, it still features a dramatically long hood, which makes its faux grille feel like it belongs there instead of it being there for an ornamental effect.

However, it doesn’t mean that they haven’t done away with any form of pomp and circumstance. When you get within a few feet of the Lyriq, or you press the unlock button, the LEDs illuminating the Cadillac badge and “grille,” as well as its daytime-running lights and headlights flicker on in a sequence that announces its presence and welcomes you inside. It’s a feature that gets attention. In one instance at my local mall, someone in the parking garage asked “what is that, an Escalade?”

Although it isn’t an Escalade, the rest of the car is styled like something you don’t really see out on the road, let alone, it isn’t a design that has been copied by another automaker for their EV. Cadillac officially classifies the Lyriq as an SUV, but its long, elongated and somewhat low stance (for an SUV), as well as its side and rear profile give it more of the character of a shooting brake (not a wagon, sorry) than a traditional crossover. Ideally, I’d like to think that the hatchback-esque rear end is a modern-day callback to past Cadillacs like the “bustle-back” Sevilles from the 1980s, or the CTS and CTS-V Sport Wagons of the 2010s.

Welcome to Tactile Paradise

While the Cadillac Lyriq is quick and good looking, its paramount strength is in the space of its  cabin; which is an amazing place to be if you are either the driver or a passenger. Your kids, friends or other passengers you might have in the rear will have all the space they need. According to Cadillac, rear seat passengers get 39.6 inches of legroom and 37.7 inches of headroom; an ample space to spread out or sit up, even if you are within the six foot territory. Backseaters also get controls for their own climate zone, heated seats, dual USB-C chargers and a full-size 120V outlet for charging a wide array of devices. Lots of cabin space doesn’t mean the Lyriq has a small trunk. Caddy says there is a cavernous 28 cubic feet of cargo space behind the seats and 60.8 cubic feet with the seats down — more than enough for a family’s Costco run with or without the kids.  

Though passengers in the back get first-class treatment, the driver is treated to a cabin that is driver-focused in both form and function. The top-trim Signature Sport model provided a level of technology and equipment that didn’t diminish from the driving experience, rather, it provided a tactile experience that other brands seem to be shying away from. The dashboard is highlighted by a massive 33-inch touchscreen that acts as its both gauge cluster and infotainment portal, but it isn’t the vehicle’s nexus, it isn’t the center of everything.

View the 7 images of this gallery on the original article

Shifting from park to drive to reverse is still done using a dedicated stalk in around the same place as a traditional old-school column shifter, while the HVAC controls are still rocker switches that are at an easily touchable height level on the dashboard. In addition, resting your right arm on the center console enables use of a scroll wheel, volume controls and an easy-to-temember shortcut pad with buttons for important infotainment functions like maps/navigation and audio controls. Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are available, but I felt that the Cadillac’s Google built-in applications for services like Google Maps and Apple Music were sufficient.

Up top, a panoramic glass roof with a power shade can help bring sunlight by day and moonlight to the cabin, while ambient lighting around the cabin helps illuminate the mood. However, my favorite feature inside was the 23-speaker AKG Studio audio system, with speakers all over the cabin, including the headliner and even the front-seat headrests. I wrote about how this vehicle’s Dolby Atmos made listening to music while driving a 360-degree experience beyond words in a separate piece, but all I could say is that there is a way to use all 23 speakers and that it sounds amazing.

Related: I Thought My Car Already Sounded Great. Then I Heard Dolby Atmos

The Cadillac of EVs or The EV That Happens to be a Cadillac?

The 2027 Cadillac Lyriq I tested was the top-line Signature Sport AWD model, which has an MSRP of $67,300. Our vehicle was equipped with a $3,790 Nappa Leather Package, $3,500 AWD system, the $1,480 optional 19.2 kW AC charging module, $1,325 Radiant Red paint, $695 Black Roof, as well as NACS adapters for both CCS1 and J1172 plugs, which cost $189 and $67 respectively. In total, the out-the-door price for the Lyriq I tested, including destination, was $80,141.

After spending some time with the Lyriq, I wanted to conclude that the Lyriq is a vehicle that can be best described as the “ultimate manifestation of Cadillac.” Despite being a midsize crossover SUV, the vehicle’s design and dimensions and behind-the-wheel feel make it feel like a vehicle about one and a half to double its size. In a practical sense, its high beltline, long hood and massive turning circle made it a hoot to drive around the cramped streets of Manhattan and Brooklyn; even early in the morning when the day’s traffic slowly trickles into the madness the city is known for.

While that may be an inconvenience for most, for me, that’s what screams Cadillac. Add the fact that it’s a silent EV that rewards you with gobs of power every time you advance the accelerator pedal, the immersion and feel could only intensify. This realization and the residual feelings from this experience has only made me wonder about one question that still lingers in my head: is the Lyriq the Cadillac of EVs, or is it an EV that happens to be a Cadillac? 

While there’s enough evidence for interested parties to argue in the comments section to prove that it is both, it only proves to me that the Lyriq is its own unique creation that a brand like Cadillac can only offer. I feel that your conclusion on whether it lies on one side or the other is up to you to decide; no question. But, as we approach about a half-decade of production Cadillac has expanded its luxury EV presence, the 2027 model of the Lyriq only proves that Cadillac hasn’t forgotten about the vehicle that got them there in the first place. If it was good enough for the Germans to award it car of the year in the luxury category in 2024, it’s certainly good enough for you. 

I had recently spent a week with the wonderful Integra Type S before hopping into the 2026 Acura Integra A-Spec at the Northwest Automotive Press Association’s Drive Revolution event. I already knew how much I adored Acura’s faster, more expensive hatchback, so this was a chance to see whether I’d be just as happy recommending the version that costs about $15,000 less and possessed considerably less spice. My speed-date drive lasted roughly half an hour, covering enough tight corners, city streets, and highway cruising to get acquainted with its steering, six-speed manual, and suspension. The A-Spec was comfortable and easygoing, yet still engaging enough that the gearbox alone felt like a good reason to choose it. That combination earned my vote for the event’s best internal-combustion vehicle, a category the Integra ultimately won. I also ranked it second for value.

The Manual Makes The Difference

The Integra A-Spec represents one of the last examples of a dying breed of automobile in North America: the affordable, manual hot hatch. An important detail behind that A-Spec badge, though: in the U.S., the six-speed requires the Technology Package. The less expensive A-Spec uses a CVT. Choose the manual, and Acura also supplies a helical limited-slip differential and automatic rev matching. The 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder produces 200 horsepower and 192 lb-ft of torque. Peak torque spans 1,800 to 5,000 rpm, giving the engine a useful working range before its 6,500-rpm redline. Those numbers suit a car weighing just over 3,000 pounds, though shoppers expecting dramatic acceleration should temper their expectations.

I found the engine responsive and the performance ample for an entertaining on-ramp or cloverleaf, but not especially dramatic. The gearbox was the real attraction, with clearly defined gates, tidy throws, and an accommodating clutch. It made operating an otherwise sensible car something to look forward to—an element of otherwise dull daily driving that manual transmission enthusiasts perhaps miss most. The pleasure of engaging with a machine needs to survive those otherwise boring journeys, especially when an automatic would be easier. Acura gives you a good reason to keep reaching for the lever.

Thinking about selling your car? Get an instant cash offer online now. Click here to get started.

Comfortable Enough To Enjoy Every Day

The steering’s accuracy carried through the rest of the drive, and the suspension allowed some body movement without spoiling the fun. More importantly, the A-Spec rode beautifully, and Comfort mode calmed the ride tremendously when I just wanted to cruise. Adaptive dampers come with the Technology Package, alongside Comfort, Normal, Sport, and customizable Individual drive modes. Having that adjustment makes particular sense in a car whose job description includes both the commute and the occasional weekend jaunt.

I can see the appeal for someone who enjoys driving but also needs to cover the school run, a wet commute, and a weekend away. The car has to earn its place on all of those trips. For 2026, Acura has freshened the A-Spec with new wheel designs, additional aero detailing, and extended ambient lighting. Performance Red Pearl cars like the one I drove also receive a color-matched grille.

Shopping for a new car? Click here to get a great deal on your next vehicle. Powered by Carvana: no-haggle pricing, 100% online.

The Hatchback Is A Major Part Of The Attraction

The liftback body deserves as much attention as the manual transmission. Acura lists 24.3 cubic feet of cargo room, and the rear seatbacks split and fold. A larger opening makes it easier to fit awkward luggage than feeding it through a conventional trunk, which is especially appealing if this will be your only car. Before signing up for a crossover, consider whether a hatchback already covers the bags, shopping, and weekend gear you actually carry. The Integra gives enthusiasts a useful answer to a familiar question: how much fun can you retain when the car also has to be sensible?

The Technology Package also includes heated microsuede-trimmed front seats, a head-up display, and a 16-speaker ELS Studio 3D audio system. A moonroof comes standard, too—something you lose when you upgrade to the Type S. Every 2026 Integra now gets a nine-inch touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and wireless charging. When you choose this version, you’re paying for better audio, seat trim, a head-up display, and adjustable suspension.

The Real Verdict

The manual A-Spec with Technology Package starts at $39,200 in the U.S., or $40,595 with Acura’s current $1,395 destination charge, before premium paint. That puts it $14,700 below the Type S on the same basis. The EPA rates it at 26 mpg city, 36 highway, and 30 combined. The Civic Si deserves a place on the shopping list for anyone who wants an engaging manual for even less, but the Acura’s hatchback and extra equipment help justify the added cost.

I’d still stretch for the Type S if driving excitement were the overriding priority. I explored that choice in my A-Spec versus Type S comparison, but I am admittedly a fool with my money. For someone who wants a comfortable daily driver with a rewarding manual and useful cargo space, the A-Spec deserves serious consideration. Its blend of comfort and involvement earned my vote after just half an hour, and it’s worth commending that a vehicle like this even exists in 2026, when seemingly every alternative has swapped engaging driving dynamics for huge screens and automated assists. It’s one of the last examples of a dying breed, and it’s a damned good one.

Autoblog aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.

I always felt like Audi never truly understood the American market; the company’s sales numbers proved my sentiment. While BMW introduced its first SUV, the X5, back in 1999, Audi didn’t follow suit with the Q7 until 2005. This trend continued when BMW added the smaller X3 in 2003, and Audi did not match it with the Q5 until five years later in 2008. Fast-forward to late 2018, and BMW took another bold gamble with its largest SUV to-date, the X7. Mercedes-Benz had already introduced GLS (formerly the GL) in 2006, but the X7 quickly proved to be a strong competitor for buyers who wanted a full-size German SUV. 

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

The Audi Q7 had three rows of seats, but it was smaller than the X7 and GLS, and therefore could not match them for comfort and luxury. Nearly a decade after the X7’s debut, the engineers at Ingolstadt have finally realized that American buyers’ idea of a “large SUV” is different from Europe. The 2027 Audi Q9 (and SQ9) enter the market ready to face the competition head-on. With so many years of research and comparisons, Audi could be arriving late to the game but with the perfect playbook to attract new customers to the brand.

What Is The Audi Q9?

At 209 inches long, the Q9 arrives as the largest Audi product in the company’s history. It sits nearly 10 inches longer than the Q7 with a wheelbase that’s stretched by 5.6 inches. That space is valuable for passengers and cargo, where the Q9 is specifically crafted to give BMW and Mercedes a tough time.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

Second-row passengers get 41.6 inches of legroom, besting the X7 and falling just shy of the GLS. The third-row accommodates 29.1 inches of legroom, which is behind the BMW and Mercedes by a sizable margin. Audi appears to have prioritized cargo space, where the Q9’s 19.3 cubic feet behind the third row leads its German rivals, as does the 43.8-50 cubes behind the second row. With both rows stowed, the Q9 packs 87.7 cubes, more than the GLS but less than the X7. It’s worth noting the Q9 comes with seating for up to seven passengers, but the $450 captain’s chairs limit the seating to six. Those seats are nearly identical to the front ones, but will not have ventilation available for the 2027 model. They also lack the ability to fold flat, severely limiting the cargo capacity.

You can easily spot an SQ9 via its more conventional grille. The Q9 features vertical slots with optional illumination, giving it a very unique appearance compared to any existing Audi. I personally don’t love the Q9’s grille, and much prefer the SQ9.

Overpowering The Competition

The Q9 might be Audi’s biggest SUV ever, but it arrives sporting an engine that’s slightly smaller than the previous Q7. A 2.9-liter V6 sits under the hood in replacement of the 3.0-liter unit in the outgoing Q7, but this Porsche-derived engine gets two turbochargers instead of one. This results in a massive output  jump from the 3.0-liter’s 335 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque to 429 hp and 442 lb-ft. For reference, the inline-six engines X7 and GLS both only produce 375 hp. Audi claims a 4.9-second 0-60 mph time, though I only observed a 5.01-second run at altitude at the first drive event in St. George, Utah. 

View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article

Audi will also offer an SQ9, packing a 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8. But whereas the outgoing SQ7 only produced 500 hp and 568 lb-ft, the new SQ9 delivers 591 hp and 590 lb-ft. The SQ9 outmatches the comparably-priced V8 engines in the X7 and GLS (523 hp and 530 hp, respectively), and punches much closer to the Alpina and AMG versions of those vehicles. Audi says the SQ9 can hit 60 mph in 3.8 seconds, quicker than the Alpina XB7 and GLS 63, though my quickest run was only 4.22 seconds in Utah. I’d like to retest the SQ9 at home in Florida, which sits at sea level.

Big Size, Big Luxury

To properly compete with BMW and Mercedes, the Q9 can’t just be spacious, it needs to be Audi’s most luxurious interior. That’s why this flagship SUV is treated to standard heated leather seats with nicer fine leather seats with heating, ventilation, and massage on the Prestige trim. Other standard amenities include wood inlays (carbon fiber on SQ9), four-zone climate control, a head-up display, a Bang & Olufsen Premium sound system with 3D sound, surround-view cameras, panoramic glass sunroof, surround-view camera, ambient interior lighting, and acoustic glass.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

Uppers trims add a dash camera, five-zone climate control, soft-close doors, power-operated doors, panoramic roof with lighting and variable light control, surround-view cameras with 3D view, and a 22-speaker Bang & Olufsen Premium sound system with 4D audio.

This cabin feels like a top-notch Audi product, and it comes alive more at night. The ambient lighting is vibrant without being tacky, and the sound-insulation is library quiet. My driving partner was mid-conversation with me while taking photos, and once the power door closed, his speech became completely inaudible thanks to the insulated glass.

Tech For Tech’s Sake?

Every Q9 trim includes three screens: an 11.9-inch gauge cluster display, 14.5-inch touchscreen, and a 12.3-inch passenger display. Certain functions are easy to find with visual menus that let you find what you are looking for based on where it is on the car. For example, you click on an image of the head-up display to adjust it. Other functions aren’t as self-explanatory, like adjusting the climate vents or tuning the radio. Audi says many of these tasks can be done with the ChatGPT-powered voice command, but I found it unwilling or unable to execute some of my requests (like closing the power doors). 

View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article

The digital cockpit gauge cluster is less intuitive than previous Audi MMI systems, and there is seemingly less customizability. I also miss the separate touchscreen for climate controls in the Q7 and Q8, as the Q9 puts these functions on a ribbon that stays on the central touchscreen. You’d think the passenger screen could be used to adjust the temperature or vent positions, but instead you need to leave your current menu on the central screen to change them. The passenger screen has some useful functionality, like the ability to download apps like Disney+ to stream content, but other platforms such as Netflix are not available in the Audi store. There is no rear seat entertainment available in the Q9, so only the front passenger will be able to enjoy this content.

It’s A True Flagship

I started my day in Utah in the standard Q9, which rides on adaptive air suspension as-standard. The ride is sublime, prioritizing comfort over sporty handling. Even in Dynamic mode on 22-inch wheels, large bumps don’t upset the Q9 and rough roads are not transmitted to the driver. This is possibly the most comfortable and quiet vehicle in its class, though it’s less sporty than the X7. I wish this car had the predictive suspension from the A8/S8, but that would likely add over $7,000 to the Q9’s price.

View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article

Compared to its body-on-frame competition from America and Japan, the Q9 feels spry. Optional rear-wheel steering makes the car feel even more stable through corners, and maneuverable at low speeds. The Q9 has light steering, as most Audi vehicles do, giving drivers a relaxing but not utterly disconnected driving experience. I love the twin-turbo V6, which has been used in several Audi vehicles like the RS5, S6, and S7 as well as Porsche vehicles like the Panamera. It’s quiet when you want it to be and it makes a nice howl when you drive spiritedly.

RS Performance At An S Price

While I fully believe the Q9 packs enough performance for most buyers, the extra grunt from the SQ9 is intoxicating. The additional power makes the car even more effortless and the rumble from the V8 sounds even more premium. Audi also grants the SQ9 an electronically controlled locking rear differential with a more rear-biased quattro all-wheel-drive system. It’s noticeable on curvy roads, sending more power rearward and nudging the car more aggressively around corners.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

The SQ9 also rides on a sport-tuned air suspension that sacrifices some of the standard Q9 cushiness in exchange for superior handling. Heavier steering, rear-wheel steering, and more aggressive tuning make the SQ9 shrink around the driver. On a back road, you can forget there are two rows of seats behind you as the SQ9 does its best impression of an RS6 wagon. Audi has done something impressive here: making an S model feel like an RS.

A Well-Priced Status Symbol

Audi’s largest SUV ever arrives priced at $89,095 (including a $1,395 destination fee) for the base Premium model. The Premium Plus trim adds $5,600 while the Prestige is a whopping $14,700, and there are still packages to add on top of those. The Q9 I drove rang in at $110,095 with the Prestige, Black Optic, and Luxury packages equipped. For only a bit more, the SQ9 starts at $119,395, though it too can add options. The ones I drove checked in at $128,045 with 23-inch wheels, B&O 4D audio, captain’s chairs, and the Luxury Package.

View the 3 images of this gallery on the original article

Those might seem like high price tags, but the Q9 and SQ9 are well-priced for their segment. The Q9 is marginally more expensive than the X7 but significantly less than the GLS despite having more power than both. Audi priced the SQ9 about $2,000 to $3,000 above the V8-powered GLS 580 and X7 M60i, but it’s nearer to the GLS 63 and Alpina XB7 in terms of power and performance. That makes the SQ9 the best “bargain” in the segment until the updated X7 possibly dethrones it.

American customers and dealerships have been begging Audi to build something larger than the Q7 for at least a decade now. Audi may be late, but it has the right game plan to be a strong competitor, possibly the strongest in the segment. This is the most America-friendly SUV Audi has ever made. Traditional Audi buyers are going to love it, and it should attract plenty of new buyers to the brand.